Posts Tagged ‘Estimating Software’

The Five Estimate Classes: Class 2, Control

by Hard Dollar on February 3rd, 2012

Class 2 EstimateThis post is the fourth installment in a series of posts about AACE’s 5 Estimating Classes. Designed for the new construction employee (engineer, estimator, and field personnel), we will take a high-level look the five types of estimates.

One of the ways that HD Project Cost Management software is unique is that it can handle the full gamut of estimate types, everything from Class 5 through Class 1.

The Class 2 or “Control” estimate will include anywhere from 30-70% project definition. Picking up where the C3 estimate left off, the C2 estimate is detailed enough to use as a control baseline with which to measure all project work cost and project control. Many contractors use the C2 as a bid estimate to assign contract value.

HD Project Cost Management is the key to accurately defining the higher levels of detail required by a C2 estimate. HD can be used throughout the duration of the project to measure progress and adjust variables if/when project changes occur.


The Five Estimate Classes: Class 3, Authorization

by Hard Dollar on January 27th, 2012

Class 3 EstimateThis post is the third installment in a series of posts about AACE’s 5 Estimating Classes. Designed for the new construction employee (engineer, estimator, and field personnel), we will take a high-level look the five types of estimates.

One of the ways that HD Project Cost Management software is unique is that it can handle the full gamut of estimate types, everything from Class 5 through Class 1.

The Class 3 or “Authorization” estimate is much more definitive than Classes 4 and 5. A C3 estimate is nearing the 50% definition mark, with anywhere from 10-40% of the project defined. Budget, appropriation, and control are key reasons for building a C3 estimate. Having completed the C4 estimate, we determined that the project will proceed to the C3 stage. With the C3 estimate, we’re beginning to nail down the entire scope of the project, and data included in the C3 estimate will be used against the actual costs as the project nears completion.

Class 3 estimate methodology is mixed, but contains somewhat detailed unit costs with assembly level (rather than an individual component level) line items. HD’s ability to add assemblies from libraries or historical data allows the estimator to efficiently and accurately build out a C3 estimate.


The Five Estimate Classes: Class 4, Feasibility

by Hard Dollar on January 20th, 2012

Class 4 EstimateThis post is the second installment in a series of posts about AACE’s 5 Estimating Classes. Designed for the new construction employee (engineer, estimator, and field personnel), we will take a high-level look the five types of estimates.

One of the ways that HD Project Cost Management software is unique is that it can handle the full gamut of estimate types, everything from Class 5 through Class 1.

The Class 4 or “Feasibility” estimate is slightly more definitive than the Class 5. Like the C5 estimates, C4 estimates are typically put together based on very little information. They are most often used for concept evaluation, project screening or gating, feasibility studies, or initial budget planning and approval. The definition required in a C4 estimate is only 1-15% and may include details like plant capacity, schematics, layout, and process flow. The C4 estimate intends to make a determination on whether or not the project continues on to the next stage of the process.

Class 4 estimate methodology is based on equipment factored or parametric models. HD’s BidWizard is used in this type of estimating often in tandem with data easily integrated from third-party providers such as RSMeans and Richardson.


The “Triangle of Truth” in Project Cost Management for Construction

by Hard Dollar on December 30th, 2011

triangle of truthWhether you are building a birdhouse, a bungalow, or a bridge, three things are common during any construction project – scope, time, and cost.

Let’s use the “Triangle of Truth” to illustrate how risk may be associated with these tenets. Most of us begin every project believing the triangle is perfectly balanced. Inevitably, though, something in the estimating, scheduling, design, planning, controls, or progress phase changes. The minute we stretch that triangle and shift the angles, we affect the delicate balance between scope, time, and cost of a project.

Unlike several other industries where the outcome is predictable, construction companies, owners and subcontractors are constantly managing upstream, downstream, and internal resources. Visibility and cause-and-effect scenarios are critical in helping to complete a project and plan for the next one. Systems that help manage risk or show the gaps in our processes help restore the balance of the triangle.

Hard Dollar’s Project Cost Management is designed to literally manage the “truth” of your project and provide integration to the systems you already have in place (no IT army necessary).

Learn how to manage risk with Hard Dollar’s Project Cost Management by clicking here.


Hard Dollar Brings Project Cost Management to POWER-GEN, Booth 9530

by Hard Dollar on December 9th, 2011

We are very excited to be participating in the POWER-GEN International show in Vegas next week.

This promises to be a HUGE show with over 1,200 exhibitors and 19,000 attendees. We are located near the Alstom Cyber Café, in Booth 9530.

Representing Hard Dollar’s Project Cost Management solution will be Sales Execs Chris Wright and Jake Schillaci (the bald and the coiffed respectively), and yours truly, Joanie Hollabaugh, for the marketing team.

The show is co-located with the NUCLEAR POWER International show, and the promoters have dubbed it a “two pair” event.

So Vegas!


Estimating for Newbies / Chapter Six: Construction Phase—Getting to the Punch (List)

by Hard Dollar on October 14th, 2011

This post is the sixth installment in a series of estimating basics. Designed for the new construction employee (engineer, estimator, and field personnel), we will take a high-level look at how the construction industry works, from the estimating point of view.

Assuming the pre- or post-bid schedule is created, there are additional processes and key factors crucial to the construction phase: cash flow, hand-off proposals, preconstruction conference, field meetings, and progress payments and billing.  Whew! “How about a nice Hawaiian punch?”

Cash Flow

If schedules are created, than cash flow diagrams can be generated. They can be important for the company in a number of ways:

  • Based on the cash flow between cost and revenue, a finance rate can be applied to the “area under the curve.” This rate will generate a finance expense for the job. Since it can take up to 60 days before the contractor receives the first payment, the finance expense can be substantial.
  • A good cash flow also can generate a resource histogram, which is a schedule of ‘resources over time.’ This can help in determining costs, for example, whether equipment can be shared between jobs, or if rentals are required to perform work simultaneously.

 

Hand off Proposal for Execution:

It is very important for the field personnel to know the details of estimate and proposal. Here are critical questions and items in providing the field the hand-off:

  • Location of project / yard
  • Have all utility conflicts been resolved?
  • List of utility companies involved with point people and contact info
  • List of subcontractors, executed contracts, verbal agreements conveyed , scheduled provided to subs
  • Vendors supplying materials: check if all the purchase orders for materials have been submitted, and verify list of materials to still be ordered
  • Notes during the estimating phase
  • Provide the proposal bid items and unit prices
  • A list of cost items, (work breakdown structure) used in the estimate
  • Include the schedule that will be submitted to the owner

 

Preconstruction Conference:

This is the meeting with the owner before work begins, and prior to the official “notice to begin,” (which starts the contract time). At this meeting, the owner will want answers to these types of questions (which will drive his decision to accept/reject the schedule):

  • Who are the subcontractors?
  • Who are the major vendors?
  • Who are the managing personnel?
  • Who will make the final decisions?
  • Who are the utility companies involved?

 

Safety and Operation Field Meetings:

Safety should never be taken for granted and weekly meetings are highly recommended. At these meetings, discussions on pertinent construction issues may prevent or eliminate injuries and deaths. A good safety record will have a great cost impact on insurance rates. Consider:

  • If there is reinforcing steel, (especially vertical) can it cause a serious injury?
  • Is work high off the ground being “tied off”?
  • Is there adequate protection for trenches or holes in the ground?
  • Are there power lines in the vicinity? Are cranes involved?
  • Is there adequate ventilation?
  • Is there an adequate supply of goggles, gloves, hard hats, lanyards, etc.?

 

Operations meetings are for planning the actual work. Discussions regarding these topics are typical:

  • What was last week’s progress?
  • What is scheduled for this week and upcoming weeks?
  • Have all the materials been purchased and when will delivery be made?
  • Are we performing to schedule?
  • Is equipment on site or scheduled to arrive?
  • Are all personnel scheduled?
  • Do we need to work overtime to accomplish some portion of the work?
  • What impact would overtime have on the cost of the job and how would it impact the schedule?

 

Progress Payments and Billings

Progress payments are usually done on a monthly basis. The contract usually has a “cutoff” date where all the work items accomplished are measured according to the pay item quantity list. The owner has a certain timeframe after the cutoff date to deliver payment. Also, the owner may hold what is called retainage, which is a percentage of the amount earned. Retainage is kept by the owner to ensure that no over-payment has been made. The retainage is paid when the job is completed.

Punch List

After the contractor believes the job is complete, there is the final “punch list.” The owner will inspect the completed project and “list” any items that need addressing. The final payment will not be delivered until all the punch list items are complete.  Delays in completing the punch list will delay the final payment for the project.


Estimating for Newbies / Chapter Five: Construction Phase – Scheduling

by Hard Dollar on October 7th, 2011

This post is the fifth installment in a series of estimating basics. Designed for the new construction employee (engineer, estimator, and field personnel), we will take a high-level look at how the construction industry works, from the estimating point of view.

There’s always more than one way to do things, n’est ce pas? And scheduling types in estimates is no exception for the rule. So strap on your accent of choice, and let’s get down to it.

Scheduling is a major part of the estimating and execution phase, but it is important to understand the two basic types of schedules, pre- and post-bid.

  • Pre-bid: There is a distinctive advantage to creating a pre-bid schedule – despite not containing a high level of detail, they can help decide if the job can be performed within the allotted time frame. If the determination is that it cannot, then a discussion regarding liquidated damages may ensue.

 

Pre-bid schedules also help in determining the total time for supervising costs based upon the total length of the job, rather than a bid item.

  • Post-bid: Some agreements require that a project schedule is included in the contract. If this is the case, it must be submitted at the start of the job. This schedule determines the critical path. “Critical path” is defined as “the longest path of the schedule.” Any change in time in any one item will impact the end date of the schedule. This is important for the owner to decide if a request for extension of time is warranted. If the work that is part of the request for time extension is not on the critical path, it may be difficult to convince the owner of your request.

 

Another advantage of the post-bid schedule is it also allows the owner to be aware of the progress of the project.

At the same time, the post-bid schedule is also benefits the contractor. He also needs to keep track of the progress of the project. Changes in the schedule can be a basis for extra work or extensions of time.


Estimating for Newbies / Chapter Four: Proposal Fundamentals

by Hard Dollar on September 30th, 2011

This post is the fourth installment in a series of estimating basics. Designed for the new construction employee (engineer, estimator, and field personnel), we will take a high-level look at how the construction industry works, from the estimating point of view.

Proposals are different, yet somewhat the same. Yes, that’s an intentional oxymoron.

Essentially, it means you can start from a template and then customize it according to conditions and requirements. Once you master the basics of proposals, you can easily refine the variables, project by project.

And while these proposal placeholders may seem unrelated by title, they depend on each other to form the big picture:

  • Contract Completion Dates
  • Liquidated Damages
  • Permits and Liens
  • Resources

 

Contract Completion Dates

Predictably, most contracts have completion dates. This deadline will impact the project, in both time and costs. The most common types of completion dates are:

  • Completion date: when the job must be completed
  • Calendar days: literally, the calendar days when the job starts
  • Work days: certain days of the week or months of the year which do not count against the project time

 

Liquidated Damages

Liquidated Damages (LD) are costs to the contractor if the completion of the job goes beyond the contract time. Liquidated Damages are usually defined as a ‘cost per day.’ Obviously, this cost can impact the proposal amount, as it could represent hundreds or hundreds of thousands dollars. If the contractor thinks the project cannot be completed within the contract timeframe, the impact of LD should be considered. The LD amount can be added to the proposal, or the cost impact of working overtime to shorten the time frame can be included.

 

Permits and Liens:

  • Permits, including environmental, water and shore protection, right-a-way, utilities, etc., may be required and must be obtained before work begins.
  •  Liens are a type of “bond,” or security interest granted to subcontractors and vendors as protection for payments. If payments have not been made, liens can be delivered to the contractor, whereby the legal community gets involved.

 

Resources

  • Labor: There can be two different contract wage scales required for a project. The contract may require “Davis-Bacon” wages. In general, Davis-Bacon requires union wages to be paid on public works projects and non-Davis-Bacon means local wages may be paid for other type of projects. When using the Davis-Bacon scale, the proposal lists wages for the different trade categories, i.e., carpenters, operators, labors, etc. Clearly, the labor wage scale impacts the proposal amount.

 

  • Equipment: Equipment costs are a major financial component of the proposal. There are copious decisions to be made, such as:
    • Does the contractor own or rent?
    • Does the contractor need to own some and rent others?
    • If equipment is owned, how does one determine the cost?
    • How detailed should the costs be?
    • Does one want to separate the ownership costs from the operating costs?
    • Does one want to separate the fuel costs?
    • To determine an hourly rate, what usage should be used (in other words, how many hours per day/week/month/year)?
    • Does one consider standby time?

 

In general, the more detailed the rate breakdown is, the more information the contractor has to refine in the project costs. For example, if fuel costs are separated, the contractor would need to determine the fuel costs based upon the cost of the fuel by location, equipment type, etc. This can have a major impact on the project costs.

If the ownership and operating costs are separated, decisions can be made on a job-by-job basis as to how much to charge to the proposal. For example, if the actual cost of the piece of equipment has been met, the contractor may choose to only charge the cost of the operating the equipment.

  • Material: Some contracts specify USA-manufactured materials, typically for steel, rebar, cement, etc. This also can have a great impact on the proposal amount.

 

To sum up, once you have a high-level understanding of the primary components of proposals (similar), you will quickly understand how to plug in the details (dissimilar) from the estimate.

And that’s how you resolve an oxymoron.


5 Steps to Master Project and Finance Transparency

by Hard Dollar on September 23rd, 2011

Does it ever feel like you’ve hit a brick wall between your project data and your ERP system?

Project data can literally get into the minutiae when tracking estimating activities, productivity, and resources; as well as when managing controls with data on percent complete, progress quantity, labor, equipment, etc. Yet on the ERP side, you are operating at a higher level – analyzing cost codes, accruals, cash flow, etc. How do you reconcile the gap in translation between the two critical systems?

To make matters worse, there are typically three principals who input data into the system of record: the owner, the EPCM, and the contractor. This will usually result in inefficiencies in four areas:

  • Delays in reporting data
  • Inaccurate data
  • Summary/data misalignment
  • ERP lacking productivity and or earned value data

The key question then becomes, “What level of detail makes most sense?”

Let’s make this easy, in 5 steps:

  1. Eliminate internal speculation with a consistent method of measurement (quantity or percent complete)
  2. Report on summary ERP – capture detail progress
  3. Open progress to vendor input on measurements
  4. Leverage the schedule for true EVM  performance (SPI, CPI)
  5. Standardize the WBS for consistent current and historical measurement

Next, apply these principles to the common touch points in your ERP system: budget, time, receipts, progress, actual costs, and reconciliation.

This of course sounds great on paper, but how do you put it into practice? The assumption is that you are currently collecting data successfully – stay the course! There is no need to duplicate the information or force users to switch to a different system. The answer is to integrate the data so that your project and ERP systems are speaking the same language – and Hard Dollar is actually designed to do just that!

If you want to learn more about avoiding that brick wall between projects and ERP – listen to Hard Dollar VP, Ron Babich, address this during an online workshop or download the slides here.


Estimating for Newbies / Chapter Three: Contract Goals

by Hard Dollar on September 9th, 2011

This post is the third installment in a series of estimating basics. Designed for the new construction employee (engineer, estimator, and field personnel), we will take a high-level look at how the construction industry works, from the estimating point of view.

Designed to “even the playing field,” minority goals ensure the little guy can compete against the “goliaths” of the construction (and other) industries when bidding for contracts, procurement, equipment, or services.

Minority status is designated by city, state, or federal agencies by meeting set requirements. Generally stated, the purpose of these government-mandated programs is to prevent discrimination and to foster the development and growth of small business in America.

Subcontractor Minority Goals

When a call for bids is published by a public or private-sector entity, (via an RFP, RFQ, or RFI), it is standard practice to require a percentage of the total proposal amount be performed by a Minority Enterprise (usually between 5 to 20 percent, or more). The standard certifications are:

                DBE – Disadvantaged Business Enterprise

                MBE – Minority Business Enterprise

                WBE – Woman-owned Business Enterprise

Sometimes the identity of the minority subcontractor(s) doing the work must be submitted with the proposal. Not having this information may preclude the proposal being considered and/or awarded.

There is also a term called “good faith effort.” If the minority performance goal cannot be reached, a good faith effort can be supplied in lieu of meeting the goal. This means an effort has been made to contact and receive prices from minority subcontractors. The results for the bidder are usually better if they meet the goal.

 Workforce Minority Goals

Some contracts require a certain amount of the workforce to be performed by minorities. This can be a federal or local requirement. For example, if work is done on an Indian reservation, the contracting company may require a certain amount of local Indians be part of the work force. This should be considered to decide what impact this may have on the cost of the project.

Best Practice

Whether you’re the big dog or the little dog, it’s important to keep minority goals in mind when bidding on a project. Meeting the specifications for goals can have a significant impact on the quote, the bidding process, and ultimately – winning the contract.