Posts Tagged ‘Estimating’

The Five Estimate Classes: Class 4, Feasibility

by Hard Dollar on January 20th, 2012

Class 4 EstimateThis post is the second installment in a series of posts about AACE’s 5 Estimating Classes. Designed for the new construction employee (engineer, estimator, and field personnel), we will take a high-level look the five types of estimates.

One of the ways that HD Project Cost Management software is unique is that it can handle the full gamut of estimate types, everything from Class 5 through Class 1.

The Class 4 or “Feasibility” estimate is slightly more definitive than the Class 5. Like the C5 estimates, C4 estimates are typically put together based on very little information. They are most often used for concept evaluation, project screening or gating, feasibility studies, or initial budget planning and approval. The definition required in a C4 estimate is only 1-15% and may include details like plant capacity, schematics, layout, and process flow. The C4 estimate intends to make a determination on whether or not the project continues on to the next stage of the process.

Class 4 estimate methodology is based on equipment factored or parametric models. HD’s BidWizard is used in this type of estimating often in tandem with data easily integrated from third-party providers such as RSMeans and Richardson.


The Five Estimate Classes: Class 5 for Project Stage Gating

by Hard Dollar on January 13th, 2012

Class 5 EstimateThis post is the first installment in a series of posts about AACE’s 5 Estimating Classes. Designed for the new construction employee (engineer, estimator, and field personnel), we will take a high-level look the five types of estimates.

One of the ways that HD Project Cost Management software is unique is that it can handle the full gamut of estimate types, everything from Class 5 through Class 1.

The Class 5 or “Project Stage Gating” estimate is the least definitive, and subsequently, the least time consuming of the group, often requiring an hour or less to create. These estimates are typically put together based on very little data. Many times only the type of project and its location are known. As a result, the definition required in a C5 estimate is only 0-2%. The question answered by the Class 5 estimate is, in essence, “Do we want to initiate the project, or not?”

Class 5 estimate methodology is based on parametric models, judgment of the estimator, and/or analogous projects. Crews and assemblies are not included. Plug in a cost from HD ProjectFacts® (which contains high, low, and average costs by item), and parametric models tied to Excel can quickly complete a C5 estimate.


Estimating for Newbies / Chapter Four: Proposal Fundamentals

by Hard Dollar on September 30th, 2011

This post is the fourth installment in a series of estimating basics. Designed for the new construction employee (engineer, estimator, and field personnel), we will take a high-level look at how the construction industry works, from the estimating point of view.

Proposals are different, yet somewhat the same. Yes, that’s an intentional oxymoron.

Essentially, it means you can start from a template and then customize it according to conditions and requirements. Once you master the basics of proposals, you can easily refine the variables, project by project.

And while these proposal placeholders may seem unrelated by title, they depend on each other to form the big picture:

  • Contract Completion Dates
  • Liquidated Damages
  • Permits and Liens
  • Resources

 

Contract Completion Dates

Predictably, most contracts have completion dates. This deadline will impact the project, in both time and costs. The most common types of completion dates are:

  • Completion date: when the job must be completed
  • Calendar days: literally, the calendar days when the job starts
  • Work days: certain days of the week or months of the year which do not count against the project time

 

Liquidated Damages

Liquidated Damages (LD) are costs to the contractor if the completion of the job goes beyond the contract time. Liquidated Damages are usually defined as a ‘cost per day.’ Obviously, this cost can impact the proposal amount, as it could represent hundreds or hundreds of thousands dollars. If the contractor thinks the project cannot be completed within the contract timeframe, the impact of LD should be considered. The LD amount can be added to the proposal, or the cost impact of working overtime to shorten the time frame can be included.

 

Permits and Liens:

  • Permits, including environmental, water and shore protection, right-a-way, utilities, etc., may be required and must be obtained before work begins.
  •  Liens are a type of “bond,” or security interest granted to subcontractors and vendors as protection for payments. If payments have not been made, liens can be delivered to the contractor, whereby the legal community gets involved.

 

Resources

  • Labor: There can be two different contract wage scales required for a project. The contract may require “Davis-Bacon” wages. In general, Davis-Bacon requires union wages to be paid on public works projects and non-Davis-Bacon means local wages may be paid for other type of projects. When using the Davis-Bacon scale, the proposal lists wages for the different trade categories, i.e., carpenters, operators, labors, etc. Clearly, the labor wage scale impacts the proposal amount.

 

  • Equipment: Equipment costs are a major financial component of the proposal. There are copious decisions to be made, such as:
    • Does the contractor own or rent?
    • Does the contractor need to own some and rent others?
    • If equipment is owned, how does one determine the cost?
    • How detailed should the costs be?
    • Does one want to separate the ownership costs from the operating costs?
    • Does one want to separate the fuel costs?
    • To determine an hourly rate, what usage should be used (in other words, how many hours per day/week/month/year)?
    • Does one consider standby time?

 

In general, the more detailed the rate breakdown is, the more information the contractor has to refine in the project costs. For example, if fuel costs are separated, the contractor would need to determine the fuel costs based upon the cost of the fuel by location, equipment type, etc. This can have a major impact on the project costs.

If the ownership and operating costs are separated, decisions can be made on a job-by-job basis as to how much to charge to the proposal. For example, if the actual cost of the piece of equipment has been met, the contractor may choose to only charge the cost of the operating the equipment.

  • Material: Some contracts specify USA-manufactured materials, typically for steel, rebar, cement, etc. This also can have a great impact on the proposal amount.

 

To sum up, once you have a high-level understanding of the primary components of proposals (similar), you will quickly understand how to plug in the details (dissimilar) from the estimate.

And that’s how you resolve an oxymoron.


Estimating for Newbies / Chapter Three: Contract Goals

by Hard Dollar on September 9th, 2011

This post is the third installment in a series of estimating basics. Designed for the new construction employee (engineer, estimator, and field personnel), we will take a high-level look at how the construction industry works, from the estimating point of view.

Designed to “even the playing field,” minority goals ensure the little guy can compete against the “goliaths” of the construction (and other) industries when bidding for contracts, procurement, equipment, or services.

Minority status is designated by city, state, or federal agencies by meeting set requirements. Generally stated, the purpose of these government-mandated programs is to prevent discrimination and to foster the development and growth of small business in America.

Subcontractor Minority Goals

When a call for bids is published by a public or private-sector entity, (via an RFP, RFQ, or RFI), it is standard practice to require a percentage of the total proposal amount be performed by a Minority Enterprise (usually between 5 to 20 percent, or more). The standard certifications are:

                DBE – Disadvantaged Business Enterprise

                MBE – Minority Business Enterprise

                WBE – Woman-owned Business Enterprise

Sometimes the identity of the minority subcontractor(s) doing the work must be submitted with the proposal. Not having this information may preclude the proposal being considered and/or awarded.

There is also a term called “good faith effort.” If the minority performance goal cannot be reached, a good faith effort can be supplied in lieu of meeting the goal. This means an effort has been made to contact and receive prices from minority subcontractors. The results for the bidder are usually better if they meet the goal.

 Workforce Minority Goals

Some contracts require a certain amount of the workforce to be performed by minorities. This can be a federal or local requirement. For example, if work is done on an Indian reservation, the contracting company may require a certain amount of local Indians be part of the work force. This should be considered to decide what impact this may have on the cost of the project.

Best Practice

Whether you’re the big dog or the little dog, it’s important to keep minority goals in mind when bidding on a project. Meeting the specifications for goals can have a significant impact on the quote, the bidding process, and ultimately – winning the contract.


MACTEC Selects Hard Dollar For Standardization Project

by Hard Dollar on October 7th, 2008

Scottsdale, Ariz. – October 7, 2008 – Hard Dollar Corporation, the industry leader for Project Cost Management, today announced its selection by MACTEC, Inc (MACTEC) as the solution to standardize their entire estimating and project operations. In addition, MACTEC is the first Hard Dollar customer to roll out the newly released Hard Dollar hosted offering.

(more…)


Half of ENR Top-Rated Environmental Firms Use Hard Dollar

by Hard Dollar on September 24th, 2008

SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. (BUSINESS WIRE) – Engineering News-Record (ENR), a McGraw-Hill publication, recently published a list of the Top 200 Environmental Contractors in the U.S. Hard Dollar, a leading provider of operations management software to owners and contractors, is pleased to announce that numerous customers appeared on the list, including half of the top 6 companies.

(more…)


Vertigraph Partnership to Streamline Takeoff and Estimating

by Hard Dollar on March 11th, 2008

Tempe, AZ and Dallas, TX – March 11, 2008 – Hard Dollar Corporation, and Vertigraph, Inc. today announced a technology partnership that will allow customers to radically simplify the takeoff and estimating processes by incorporating Vertigraph’s BidScreen XL on-screen measurement tool with Hard Dollar’s estimating software. This technology allows contractors to complete project bids in a fraction of the time, with a clear and concise audit trail. This approach results in winning more business while lowering costs.

(more…)


Hard Dollar and DRMcNatty & Associates, Inc. Partner

by Hard Dollar on January 29th, 2008

Tempe, AZ and Mission Viejo, CA – January 29, 2008 – DRMcNatty & Associates and Hard Dollar Corporation today announced a new technology partnership to bring complementary estimating, scheduling and project management solutions to the Engineering and Construction, Power, Energy and Oil & Gas markets. The partnership is part of each company’s goal to provide leading-edge and easy-to-integrate software solutions that will help clients increase productivity, fulfill business objectives and raise revenues.

(more…)


Hard Dollar Corporation Acquired by Investor Group

by Hard Dollar on June 10th, 2004

New Leadership to Focus on Greater Opportunity for Growth and Innovation in Construction Industry Software Market

TEMPE, AZ – June 10, 2004 – Hard Dollar Corporation, the infrastructure construction industry’s leading provider of software, data, and services for estimating, bidding, and construction management, today announced the acquisition of the company by a group of investors. Investment banking firm Greentree Partners and private investors purchased a majority interest in Hard Dollar from Whitney & Co. and Vectis Group, who will continue as equity partners. Specific terms of the deal were not disclosed.

(more…)